On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:57:55 +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: >On date Wednesday 2012-02-01 18:47:40 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded: >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Benjamin Larsson wrote: >> > >> > >Id like to see the libav vs ffmpeg relation clarified in the document >> > >the names suggest to the average reader a relation that is different >> > >from what it actually is. >> > >> > Either edit it yourself or post how you would like to have it clarified. >[...] >> And last but not least, It should go without saying but if you want >> FFmpeg and libav have a joint GSOC, the technical discussions must stay >> on public mailing lists and IRC channels from which no ffmpeg developer >> is baned. (this is not the case in the current design described on the >> wiki page). > >[CC-ing libav-devel as this may be of interest to them.] > >I had a chat with Ronald with regards to the the gsoc joint >application, and we concluded that a shared mailing list/channel >doesn't seem very feasible, mostly because of the flames and frictions >that this could very likely generate, which won't be any good to the >students.
is michael still banned from libav list? -compn _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
