On 2012-02-13 13:29:01 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> From: "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]>
> 
> They were introduced in an earlier commit that introduced use of named
> arguments. One cause was a typo, a second cause appears to be a bug in
> x264asm that I work around by not using named arguments.
> ---
>  libswscale/x86/output.asm |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libswscale/x86/output.asm b/libswscale/x86/output.asm
> index 6017bf1..c4daa82 100644
> --- a/libswscale/x86/output.asm
> +++ b/libswscale/x86/output.asm
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ SECTION .text
>  %macro yuv2planeX_fn 3
>  
>  %if ARCH_X86_32
> -%define cntr_reg filterq
> +%define cntr_reg fltsizeq
>  %define movsx mov
>  %else
>  %define cntr_reg r11
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ cglobal yuv2planeX_%1, %3, 7, %2, filter, fltsize, src, 
> dst, w, dither, offset
>      mova            m1, [yuv2yuvX_%1_start]
>      mova            m2,  m1
>  %endif ; %1 == 8/9/10/16
> -    movsx     cntr_reg,  fltsizem
> +    movsx     cntr_reg,  r1m ; FIXME should be fltsizem, but the assembler 
> does the wrong thing b/c of SUB above
>  .filterloop_ %+ %%i:
>      ; input pixels
>      mov             r6, [srcq+gprsize*cntr_reg-2*gprsize]

lgtm

Janne
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to