2012/2/27 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:13:56PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>> Felipe Contreras <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> > + for (i = 0; i < avctx->height; i++) >>> > + memcpy(f->data[0] + i * f->linesize[0], p1 + i * avctx->width, >>> > + avctx->width); >>> > + for (i = 0; i < avctx->height / 2; i++) >>> > + memcpy(f->data[1] + i * f->linesize[1], p2 + i * avctx->width / >>> > 2, >>> > + avctx->width / 2); >>> > + for (i = 0; i < avctx->height / 2; i++) >>> > + memcpy(f->data[2] + i * f->linesize[2], p3 + i * avctx->width / >>> > 2, >>> > + avctx->width / 2); >>> >>> This is really not acceptable. >> >> Please enlighten us about the alternative. > > The alternative to copying is to not copy, obviously.
I can do that, but then of course the result would be garbage. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
