"Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > 2012/3/1 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: >> Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 08:32:06AM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > On 64bit platforms with 32bit int, this means we won't have to sign- >>>> > extend the integer anymore. >>>> > --- >>>> > libavcodec/arm/vp8dsp_init_arm.c | 32 ++++---- >>>> > libavcodec/ppc/vp8dsp_altivec.c | 16 ++-- >>>> > libavcodec/vp8dsp.c | 44 +++++----- >>>> > libavcodec/vp8dsp.h | 38 +++++----- >>>> > libavcodec/x86/vp8dsp-init.c | 158 >>>> > +++++++++++++++++++------------------- >>>> > 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> Ping. >>> >>> is it still intptr? >> >> I still think these should be ptrdiff_t. > > See old thread, some people object to intptr_t and others object to > ptrdiff_t, for orthogonal reasons. Someone had to make a decision, > that person was me, and it is intptr_t. This is consistent with what > x264 does and thus probably a good long-term idea anyway.
Two wrongs never make a right. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
