"Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> 2012/3/1 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>:
>> Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 08:32:06AM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > On 64bit platforms with 32bit int, this means we won't have to sign-
>>>> > extend the integer anymore.
>>>> > ---
>>>> >  libavcodec/arm/vp8dsp_init_arm.c |   32 ++++----
>>>> >  libavcodec/ppc/vp8dsp_altivec.c  |   16 ++--
>>>> >  libavcodec/vp8dsp.c              |   44 +++++-----
>>>> >  libavcodec/vp8dsp.h              |   38 +++++-----
>>>> >  libavcodec/x86/vp8dsp-init.c     |  158 
>>>> > +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>> >  5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Ping.
>>>
>>> is it still intptr?
>>
>> I still think these should be ptrdiff_t.
>
> See old thread, some people object to intptr_t and others object to
> ptrdiff_t, for orthogonal reasons. Someone had to make a decision,
> that person was me, and it is intptr_t. This is consistent with what
> x264 does and thus probably a good long-term idea anyway.

Two wrongs never make a right.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to