Hi,

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> +        if (HAVE_THREADS && 
>>> (s->avctx->active_thread_type&FF_THREAD_FRAME)) {
>>> +            av_log_missing_feature(s->avctx, "Width/height/bit 
>>> depth/chroma idc changing with threads is", 0);
>>> +            return -1;   // width / height changed during parallelized 
>>> decoding
>>> +        }
>>
>> I have doubts about this...
>
> Ronald withdrew his objections in chat.
>
> Do any others remain?

Just to clarify, I do wish that at some point we can implement this,
but this sort of stuff is hard and will take a long time, so I'm fine
with the patch as-is as a temporary solution.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to