On 20/03/2012, at 01.37, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 19/03/12 16:43, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> From my point of view, OSX is fringe. Besides, we have plain C code too. >> The speed difference is not staggering. > > If it isn't we might try to simplify it by checking that construct is > supported and leave unsupported compilers out. > > I guess we could make 100% sure brew, gentoo-prefix and every other > offset-distro provide a compiler working for the target and just add a > big warning and point on the safe compiler they could use if they need > this additional bit of speed.
>From the discussion this sounds like a llvm specific bug. On OS X the default >gcc compiler uses a llvm backend for the compilation, as can be seen from >--version $ gcc --version i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.9.00) However we still have a pure gcc compiler in gcc-4.2: $ gcc-4.2 --version i686-apple-darwin11-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3) I expect compiles will still work using the latter. /Gil _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
