On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Sean McGovern <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 29/04/12 15:25, Sean McGovern wrote: >>> Can I get a ping for this and Måns wonderful Altivec fixes? :) >>> >>> -- Sean McG >>> >> >> What's missing? Point me to that and we'll merge all that should =) >> > > Actually on second thought, hold off for a bit -- I should really > verify it doesn't change anything on ppc32 (might take a bit, my G4 is > a lot slower than the POWER7 box) :) >
OK, FATE run successful on ppc32. Here's the patchwork links for the patches I am requesting to be applied: http://patches.libav.org/patch/20870/ -- dvenc: do not call dsputil functions with stride not a multiple of 16 http://patches.libav.org/patch/20871/ -- ppc: dsputil: do unaligned block accesses correctly http://patches.libav.org/patch/20878/ -- ppc: fix scalarproduct_and_madd_int16_altivec() http://patches.libav.org/patch/20880/ -- ppc: remove shift parameter from scalarproduct_int16_altivec() http://patches.libav.org/patch/20879/ -- ppc: add const where needed in scalarproduct_int16_altivec() and finally... http://patches.libav.org/patch/20882/ -- configure: add POWER[5-7] support (should this be re-titled to POWER[3-7] ?) And on an unrelated and slightly less important note, I'd also like to ping: http://patches.libav.org/patch/20847/ -- test programs: don't ignore the return value of fwrite() -- Sean McG. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
