On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:41:27PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:34:48PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > > --- a/tests/fate/vpx.mak > > > +++ b/tests/fate/vpx.mak > > > @@ -19,12 +10,21 @@ fate-vp3: $(FATE_VP3) > > > FATE_AVCONV += fate-vp5 > > > fate-vp5: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/vp5/potter512-400-partial.avi -an > > > > > > -FATE_AVCONV += fate-vp6a > > > +FATE_VP6 += fate-vp60 > > > +fate-vp60: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/ea-vp6/g36.vp6 > > > + > > > +FATE_VP6 += fate-vp61 > > > +fate-vp61: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/ea-vp6/MovieSkirmishGondor.vp6 > > > -t 4 > > > > What are vp60 and vp61 supposed to signify? Are these different > > variants of the codec or just two numbered tests of the same thing? In > > the latter case, a hyphen should be inserted between the codec and the > > test number like for other such > > There are different fourccs for vp6, VP60 and VP61 being two of them. > Apparently both samples are VP60 though.
Well, if you look into files themselves, one features 'vp60' and another one 'vp61' in its header. Not that it makes a difference to our decoder. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
