Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> These two files use the same audio codec so only one test for >> this is needed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> >> --- >> tests/fate/demux.mak | 6 -- >> tests/fate/dpcm.mak | 3 + >> tests/fate/video.mak | 6 ++ >> tests/ref/fate/dpcm-interplay | 125 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/ref/fate/interplay-mve-16bit | 80 ----------------------- >> tests/ref/fate/interplay-mve-8bit | 125 >> ------------------------------------ >> 6 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/dpcm-interplay > > The audio tracks have slightly different parameters: > > interplay-logo-2MB.mve > Stream #0.1: Audio: interplay_dpcm, 22050 Hz, 2 channels, s16, 352 kb/s > descent3-level5-16bit-partial.mve > Stream #0.1: Audio: interplay_dpcm, 44100 Hz, 2 channels, s16, 705 kb/s > > I worry we might be reducing test coverage here...
The sample rate is not used by the decoder. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
