On 13/05/12 22:19, Vitor Sessak wrote: > On 05/13/2012 11:40 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> Il 12/05/2012 01:15, Vitor Sessak ha scritto: >>> >>> Here is a version with 128-bit regs (again, completely untested). >> >> The patch seems to require a new series that factors "x86: use more >> standard construct for setting ASM funcitons in FFT code" into it. >> Probably you should resend the series. >> >> If you do I can test it as I have a xop-capable box at hand. > > Nice! Here is the full patchset.
Fate test passed =) Do we have a documented way to benchmark it? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
