On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:57:05PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Kostya Shishkov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:53:08PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Kostya Shishkov
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Unlike its predecessor, Indeo Audio codec generates tables depending on
> >> > sampling rate. Previously decoder used pre-generated tables for 22050 Hz
> >> > which obviously doesn't work with other frequencies.
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks to Maxim Poliakovsky for providing all needed information
> >> > for this.
> >> > ---
> >> > The difference can be heard for example on
> >> > http://www.schutze.net/video/Angel%20Bday.avi
> >> > ---
> >> >  libavcodec/imc.c     |   68 
> >> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> >  libavcodec/imcdata.h |   19 --------------
> >> >  2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Nice work, lgtm! (Thanks Maxim.)
> >
> > The funniest thing is that it came from IMC decoder which doesn't use it. 
> > But
> > there are almost no differences in code between IMC and IAC (so binary IMC
> > decoder should be able to decode IAC data in theory).
> 
> So we can merge the two decoders then?

No, they were merged from the beginning.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to