Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> configure | 4 +++- >> libavutil/mem.c | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure b/configure >> index a5d2787..f1f58a7 100755 >> --- a/configure >> +++ b/configure >> @@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ HAVE_LIST=" >> $ARCH_EXT_LIST >> $HAVE_LIST_PUB >> $THREADS_LIST >> + aligned_malloc >> aligned_stack >> alsa_asoundlib_h >> altivec_h >> @@ -2834,6 +2835,7 @@ check_func ${malloc_prefix}memalign && >> enable memalign >> check_func mkstemp >> check_func mmap >> check_func ${malloc_prefix}posix_memalign && enable posix_memalign >> +check_func ${malloc_prefix}_aligned_malloc && enable aligned_malloc > > On mingw, this function is only available if such a version of the > MSVCRT is targeted that contain it, controlled via the > headers. Currently, since this doesn't test the headers but only tests > linking, it will succeed regardless. A check which tries to include it > from the header (malloc.h) would be better in this case, I think.
Do you have such a system? Could you help testing it? -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
