>>
>> Would it be better something like: ?
>>
>> -----
>> rtsp: convert rtsp_open_transport_ctx() to non-static.
>>
>> The RTSP listen mode, which is implemented in rtspdec.c, needs this
>> functionality and in consequence more visibility for
>> rtsp_open_transport_ctx() is needed.
>> -----
>
>
> You can make it even simpler:
>
> --8<--
> rtsp: Make rtsp_open_transport_ctx() non-static
>
> This is required for the upcoming RTSP listen mode.
> --8<--
>
> This says all of it without being too wordy, don't you think?
>

Yes, you are right. More isn't always better =)
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to