On 07/13/2012 10:56 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Martin Storsjö wrote: > >> Unrelated question to others: Should we perhaps add a ff prefix to >> these protocols (rtmphttp, rtmpenc) that only are internal >> abstractions, to better separate them from the normal end-user protocols? > > Luca and others, what do you think about this? It would make the whole > concept of internal protocols as abstraction layer be a bit nicer. (I've > got a patch for converting the HTTP tunneling in RTSP into a separate > protocol layer as well, which would both abstract it nicely, as well as > add support for it in a few cases where it doesn't work right now.) >
The only problem I could foresee is if somebody wants to use them programmatically for specific purposes. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
