On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:43:13AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote : > On 07/17/2012 08:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > --- > > Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is > > not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general > > compatibility between copyleft-style licenses is tricky... > > We discussed that before the commit, the short version of fdk license > and the verbose (l)gpl version match the restriction. > > Or so it seemed to us when we committed the patch. Not sure what changed > in that interpretation.
Did any of us ask FLSC, FSFE or Chris? Best regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
