Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:57:40AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> > --- a/Makefile >> > +++ b/Makefile >> > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ COMPILE_S = $(call COMPILE,AS) >> > >> > %.ho: %.h >> > - $(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ -x c $< >> > + $(CC) $(CCFLAGS) -c $(CC_O) -x c $< >> >> OK. >> >> This leaves the -x flag to deal with somehow. > > Which raises the question of its necessity. I've never seen gcc fail > w/o it, do other compilers need it? Which ones?
I'm quite certain gcc at least used to spit warnings if given a .h file on the command line without this flag. Some compiler or other is sure to be pickier still. > It would be easy enough to hide it behind HEADER_COMPILE_FLAG or a > similar, perhaps less burdensome name that would get set in the > compiler option section of configure. Sure. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
