Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:03:21AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> > --- a/configure >> > +++ b/configure >> > @@ -2065,9 +2065,6 @@ probe_cc(){ >> > gcc_ext_ver=$(expr "$gcc_version" : ".*$gcc_pkg_ver $gcc_basever >> > \\(.*\\)") >> > _ident=$(cleanws "gcc $gcc_basever $gcc_pkg_ver $gcc_ext_ver") >> > - if ! $_cc -dumpversion | grep -q '^2\.'; then >> > - _depflags='-MMD -MF $(@:.o=.d) -MT $@' >> > - fi >> >> What harm does this do? Despite not being officially supported, gcc >> 2.95 still builds the code just fine. Keeping that line there is hardly >> a burden. > > It does not build here, I get 7 or so errors and the file with the > redirected stderr has 30k lines of warnings.
Yes, it spews warnings like crazy. So do the Windows builds. Shall we remove Windows support then? > More code to support gcc 2.95 was removed from configure in the past, > this hunk I just overlooked. Let's get rid of it. Why are you so eager to delete things? The presence of that line is not causing any problems. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
