On 2012-08-09 07:07:30 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:31:27 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > The comments in non-library code never apply to code that is used > > outside of the file and thus never need to be in Doxygen format. > > --- > > > > Rejoice, this fixes Doxygen build failures. > > > > WTF are you trying to achieve here. Do you think our disagreement on this > issue > will go away if you just ignore me and push for your solution? Well think > again.
calm down, there is nothing wrong with this patch and the exclude pattern do no harm when we give doxygen the list of installed headers. I agree that the default doxygen docs should only list public ABI. Our internal ABI is too sparsely doxygen documented and it's is safer to look at the code. The only times I look at doxygen is when I want to check what the documented behaviour of public functions is. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
