On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:47:28AM -0700, Daniel Kang wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:58:52PM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote:
>> >> On 2012-08-13 13:42:57 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  libavcodec/x86/Makefile                            |    6 +++---
>> >> >  libavcodec/x86/{pngdsp-init.c => pngdsp_init.c}    |    0
>> >> >  .../x86/{proresdsp-init.c => proresdsp_init.c}     |    0
>> >> >  libavcodec/x86/{vp8dsp-init.c => vp8dsp_init.c}    |    0
>> >> >  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >> >  rename libavcodec/x86/{pngdsp-init.c => pngdsp_init.c} (100%)
>> >> >  rename libavcodec/x86/{proresdsp-init.c => proresdsp_init.c} (100%)
>> >> >  rename libavcodec/x86/{vp8dsp-init.c => vp8dsp_init.c} (100%)
>> >>
>> >> ok, since you obviously care. do we have a rule in the developer docs to
>> >> use underscores instead of dash in filenames? I'm just asking because
>> >> the it annoys me in the Linux kernel that both are used.
>> >
>> > We don't have a rule.  We could of course add one if you want.  I haven't
>> > given a general rule much thought yet, but, as you may have guessed,
>> > inconsistencies between similar files in the same subdirectory irked me.
>>
>> Can we choose something to prevent potential multiple renames of files?
>
> Which file is at risk of being renamed multiple times and what
> would be the problem?

I am not worried about a particular file, but the case of having all
files in one directory conforming to one standard, and deciding later
to adapt a global standard.

I think deciding on a particular format now would save trouble down the road.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to