Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:25:44 +0300, Jan Ekström <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2012/08/18 16:20, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> > Better way: >> > >> > fate-utvideoenc%: CMD = framemd5 -f image2 -vcodec pgmyuv -i >> > $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/vsynth1/%02d.pgm -flags +bitexact -vcodec utvideo -f >> > avi $(OPTS) >> > fate-utvideoenc%: tests/vsynth1/00.pgm >> > >> > fate-utvideoenc_rgba_none: OPTS = -pix_fmt rgba -pred 3 >> > >> > Is the bitexact flag really necessary here? >> > >> Thank you. Will change the patch accordingly. >> >> I'm not sure if the bitexact flag is necessary, I mostly saw it being used >> in many vsynth tests, so I thought adding it there was better than not. > > I think it might be needed at least to prevent lavf from writing its > version to the output.
Not with framemd5. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
