Derek Buitenhuis <[email protected]> writes:

> On 19/08/2012 7:25 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> +    s.f = *scale;
>>>      t.i = s.i ^ (sign & 1U<<31);
>>>      *dst++ = v[idx    & 3] * t.f;
>>>  
>>> -- 
>> That is not a simplification.
>
> Indeed not, but it would seem to make it more consistent with the rest of
> the code, no? (See: line directly under it).

No, and stop making shit up.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to