On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:34:00PM -0700, Alex Converse wrote:
> ---
> Changelog | 1 +
> doc/filters.texi | 30 ++++++
> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
> libavfilter/af_asetnsamples.c | 210
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 libavfilter/af_asetnsamples.c
version bump
> --- a/doc/filters.texi
> +++ b/doc/filters.texi
> @@ -175,6 +175,36 @@ stream ends. The default value is 2 seconds.
>
> +@section asetnsamples
> +
> +Set the number of samples per each output audio frame.
s/per/for/
> +The last output packet may contain a different number of samples, as
> +the filter will flush all the remaining samples when the input audio
> +signal its end.
reaches its end ?
> +@item nb_out_samples, n
> +Set the number of frames per each output audio frame. The number is
> +intended as the number of samples @emph{per each channel}.
s/as the/to be/
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libavfilter/af_asetnsamples.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
> +
> + av_audio_fifo_read(asns->fifo,
> + (void **)outsamples->extended_data, nb_out_samples);
Why the cast, void** should be compatible with uint8_t**...
> + av_audio_fifo_write(asns->fifo, (void **)insamples->extended_data,
> nb_samples);
same
> + .description = NULL_IF_CONFIG_SMALL("Set the number of samples for
> each output audio frames."),
frame
> This is the functioning and tested version.
>
> I might as well bring up the bikesheddy questions myself:
>
> 1) Would fifo be a better name?
The current name sounds like alphabet soup to me.
Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
