On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 06:43:16PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > ---
> >  libavcodec/Makefile                         |    7 +----
> >  libavcodec/arm/mathops.h                    |   24 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  libavcodec/inverse.c                        |    1 -
> >  libavutil/inverse.c => libavcodec/mathops.c |   14 ++++++++--
> >  libavcodec/mathops.h                        |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  libavcodec/motion_est.c                     |    2 +-
> >  libavcodec/mpegvideo.c                      |    2 +-
> >  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c                  |    1 +
> >  libavcodec/ra144.c                          |    2 +-
> >  libavcodec/roqaudioenc.c                    |    2 +-
> >  libavutil/Makefile                          |    1 -
> >  libavutil/arm/intmath.h                     |   24 ------------------
> >  libavutil/intmath.h                         |   35 
> > ---------------------------
> >  libavutil/mathematics.c                     |   11 --------
> >  14 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 libavcodec/inverse.c
> >  rename libavutil/inverse.c => libavcodec/mathops.c (79%)
> 
> I'd prefer to see this split in one patch per table/macro.

ff_sqrt depends on ff_sqrt_tab and FASTDIV, which depends on ff_inverse.
So I don't see how this could be split.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to