On 2012-10-05 14:52:05 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Fixes Bug 203. > > CC:[email protected] > --- > libavfilter/vf_pad.c | 2 +- > libavfilter/vf_scale.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_pad.c b/libavfilter/vf_pad.c > index 2291b13..8adab3b 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/vf_pad.c > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_pad.c > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int config_input(AVFilterLink *inlink) > var_values[VAR_IN_H] = var_values[VAR_IH] = inlink->h; > var_values[VAR_OUT_W] = var_values[VAR_OW] = NAN; > var_values[VAR_OUT_H] = var_values[VAR_OH] = NAN; > - var_values[VAR_A] = (float) inlink->w / inlink->h; > + var_values[VAR_A] = (double) inlink->w / inlink->h; > var_values[VAR_HSUB] = 1<<pad->hsub; > var_values[VAR_VSUB] = 1<<pad->vsub; > > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c > index 949691f..4941e8d 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c > @@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ static int config_props(AVFilterLink *outlink) > var_values[VAR_IN_H] = var_values[VAR_IH] = inlink->h; > var_values[VAR_OUT_W] = var_values[VAR_OW] = NAN; > var_values[VAR_OUT_H] = var_values[VAR_OH] = NAN; > - var_values[VAR_DAR] = var_values[VAR_A] = (float) inlink->w / > inlink->h; > + var_values[VAR_DAR] = var_values[VAR_A] = (double) inlink->w / > inlink->h; > var_values[VAR_SAR] = inlink->sample_aspect_ratio.num ? > - (float) inlink->sample_aspect_ratio.num / > inlink->sample_aspect_ratio.den : 1; > + (double) inlink->sample_aspect_ratio.num / > inlink->sample_aspect_ratio.den : 1; > var_values[VAR_HSUB] = > 1<<av_pix_fmt_descriptors[inlink->format].log2_chroma_w; > var_values[VAR_VSUB] = > 1<<av_pix_fmt_descriptors[inlink->format].log2_chroma_h;
ok, looks strange that it used less precision in the computation than in storage. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
