On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 01:47:16PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> writes: > >>On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> > >>>POSIX says this about option syntax: > >>> > >>> If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with a > >>> mandatory option-argument, a conforming application shall use > >>> separate arguments for that option and its option-argument. > >>> However, a conforming implementation shall also permit applications > >>> to specify the option and option-argument in the same argument > >>> string without intervening <blank> characters. > >> > >>Do I interpret this correctly if I read it as the tools should support > >>both versions of parameter passing, so one that only supports either > >>version is incorrect? > > > >It says tools should allow both, but scripts should always separate > >them. > > Ok then, the patch is ok with minix mentioned in the commit message.
Same for me: Patch is OK, mentioning Minix is an optional plus. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
