On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote:
> In addition to the recent tables mess, the AVOption defaults behavior
> changed, so an old lavc used with a new lavu will get completely messed
> up defaults.
> ---
> doc/APIchanges | 2 +-
> libavutil/version.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> index eed0f81..24defe4 100644
> --- a/doc/APIchanges
> +++ b/doc/APIchanges
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ libavfilter: 2012-06-22
> libavformat: 2012-01-27
> libavresample: 2012-10-05
> libswscale: 2011-06-20
> -libavutil: 2011-04-18
> +libavutil: 2012-10-22
>
>
> API changes, most recent first:
> diff --git a/libavutil/version.h b/libavutil/version.h
> index d21f532..1bbebd9 100644
> --- a/libavutil/version.h
> +++ b/libavutil/version.h
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> * @{
> */
>
> -#define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MAJOR 51
> -#define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MINOR 45
> +#define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MAJOR 52
> +#define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MINOR 0
> #define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MICRO 0
>
> #define LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_INT AV_VERSION_INT(LIBAVUTIL_VERSION_MAJOR, \
Justin, didn't you want to defer some FF_API removals for release 9 to
release 10? Or did I misunderstand you?
--
regards,
Reinhard
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
