On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Justin Ruggles wrote: > On 12/03/2012 04:19 PM, Loren Merritt wrote: >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Justin Ruggles wrote: >> >>> +; NOTE: This is not bit-identical with the C version because it clips to >>> +; [-INT_MAX, INT_MAX] instead of [INT_MIN, INT_MAX] >>> + >>> +INIT_XMM ssse3 >> >> INIT_XMM ssse3, atom > > Why is that needed? We don't have 2 different ssse3 versions of that > function, and that cpuflag isn't used in the function itself.
Not really needed, but I thought it was more aesthetic to have the function name reflect what it's optimized for. Normally I expect foo_ssse3 to be an improvemenet over foo_sse2. --Loren Merritt _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
