On 2012-12-08 00:53:56 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Janne Grunau <[email protected]> writes: > > > I wouldn't be surprised there some memsets or memcpys arround using > > sizeof(array) of a LOCAL_ALIGNED variable. > > I made sure there were none when we introduced LOCAL_ALIGNED, but I > can't be sure nothing has crept in since. If there are any, they're not > causing any tests to fail.
except maybe some of the arm valgrind --undef-value-errors=yes tests. There are more/different tests failing than on x86. I haven't looked at them yet. > Comparing the code generated for x86 with and without the patch, there > are some minor differences, but nothing that looks alarming. or probably caused by something else then Janne > > -- > Måns Rullgård > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > libav-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
