On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:00:05PM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but > > the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the > > user), and the compiler doesn't support the _mm_empty intrinsic (like > > gcc, if the user hasn't added -mmmx to the cflags). > > Is there a real-world case where this makes happens? It's a little > much to have three versions of the same function...
It is very similar to cpuid(), we also have three versions of that one. I have set up a FATE instance that triggers the failure Martin's patch addresses: http://fate.libav.org/x86_32-linux-inline-asm-disabled/ Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
