On 13/01/13 20:10, Justin Ruggles wrote > Probably a good idea anyway (or at least an assert) but it seems fragile > as a solution to this specific problem. Why not check before the > overflow instead of after?
No particular reason, can be done as well. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
