On 14/01/13 10:43, Martin Storsjö wrote: > Without this, we'd signal a huge loss rate (due to wraparound) if > we had received one packet more than expected (that is, one seq > number sent twice). The code has a check for lost_interval <= 0, > but that doesn't do what was intended as long as the variable is > unsigned. > --- > libavformat/rtpdec.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
What happens if we get one more than INT_MAX though? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
