On 21/01/13 09:33, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:17:00AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 21/01/13 01:32, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> First I wonder if we should not switch from gsm/gsm.h to gsm.h, which is >>> what the source package (sort of) uses and is available on more platforms >>> and then I'm not sure if it makes sense to keep libgsm support at all. >> >> Not sure it is a good idea, it would break some distros that I could see. > > Which ones? AFAICS gsm/gsm.h is pure cargo-cult. >
Gentoo puts the header on libgsm and gsm but not in the base include dir. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
