On 2013-04-21 09:50, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 04/21/2013 04:28 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Given how small these functions are, placing them inline in a header
seemed appropriate. Other suggestions welcome, but I suspect they
will be more complicated.
rbelf-size will tell us I guess. Looks fine to me but should be tested.
I don't have rbelf-size install right now, but here is the (relevant)
output from ls and size:
before:
$ ls -l libavcodec/libavcodec.a
-rw-rw-r-- 1 biurrun src-pisa 82353412 May 6 14:41 libavcodec/libavcodec.a
text data bss dec hex filename
20288 0 0 20288 4f40 dsputil_mmx.o (ex
libavcodec/libavcodec.a)
48339 0 0 48339 bcd3 h264_qpel.o (ex
libavcodec/libavcodec.a)
after:
$ ls -l libavcodec/libavcodec.a
-rw-rw-r-- 1 biurrun src-pisa 82352708 May 6 14:06 libavcodec/libavcodec.a
text data bss dec hex filename
20288 0 0 20288 4f40 dsputil_mmx.o (ex
libavcodec/libavcodec.a)
48355 0 0 48355 bce3 h264_qpel.o (ex
libavcodec/libavcodec.a)
Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
