On 05/14/2013 01:00 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > And now, looking closer at these things, it seems that pieces of inline > assembly do rely on PIC being defined (while nothing for x86 uses > CONFIG_PIC).
We should split -fPIC from -DPIC I guess. What about adding an always-pic var that is enabled on win32 and similar that just adds -DPIC ? > Or should we change those pieces of code to check both for PIC and > __PIC__ (and/or __pic__)? That feels kinda ugly on the other hand. Looks ugly indeed and probably would be enough adding the -D when the platform is always-pic. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
