On Tue, 28 May 2013, Martin Storsjö wrote:

From: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>

---
libavcodec/vc1.c |    2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/vc1.c b/libavcodec/vc1.c
index 4ee4fc9..b8b320d 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vc1.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vc1.c
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ int ff_vc1_parse_frame_header_adv(VC1Context *v, 
GetBitContext* gb)
                        INIT_LUT(v->lumscale2, v->lumshift2, 
v->curr_luty[v->cur_field_type^1], v->curr_lutuv[v->cur_field_type^1], 0);
                        INIT_LUT(v->lumscale , v->lumshift , 
v->last_luty[v->cur_field_type  ], v->last_lutuv[v->cur_field_type  ], 1);
                    }
-                    v->curr_use_ic = 1;
+                    v->next_use_ic = v->curr_use_ic = 1;
                } else {
                    INIT_LUT(v->lumscale , v->lumshift , v->last_luty[0], 
v->last_lutuv[0], 1);
                    INIT_LUT(v->lumscale2, v->lumshift2, v->last_luty[1], 
v->last_lutuv[1], 1);
--
1.7.9.4

I guess this should be squashed into 2/15?

// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to