Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 16:36:01 Luca Barbato a écrit :
> On 27/07/13 16:34, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > ---
> > 
> > Updated with a few more instances that got added in the meantime..
> > 
> >  libavcodec/avpacket.c       |   15 +++++++++++++++
> >  libavcodec/mlp_parser.c     |    5 +++++
> >  libavcodec/mlpdec.c         |    3 +++
> >  libavcodec/options_table.h  |    3 +++
> >  libavcodec/pthread.c        |    9 +++++++++
> >  libavcodec/utils.c          |   13 +++++++++++++
> >  libavdevice/v4l2.c          |    3 +++
> >  libavfilter/avfilter.c      |    3 +++
> >  libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c |    5 +++++
> >  libavfilter/buffersink.c    |    3 +++
> >  libavfilter/buffersrc.c     |    3 +++
> >  libavfilter/internal.h      |    5 +++++
> >  libavformat/asfdec.c        |    3 +++
> >  libavformat/avidec.c        |    5 +++++
> >  libavformat/mux.c           |    3 +++
> >  libavformat/mxg.c           |    5 +++++
> >  libavformat/psxstr.c        |    3 +++
> >  libavformat/rmdec.c         |    3 +++
> >  libavformat/utils.c         |    3 +++
> >  libavutil/pixdesc.c         |    4 +++-
> >  20 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> I like the concept and I can survive with the additional noise in the code.

Wouldn't be simpler to define av_deprecated away while building libav (and 
leave it to its current value for external users)?

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to