On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31/07/13 14:44, Ben Avison wrote: >> This performs the start code search which was previously part of >> h264_find_frame_end() - the most CPU intensive part of the function. >> --- >> libavcodec/h264_parser.c | 27 +++------------------------ >> libavcodec/h264dsp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> libavcodec/h264dsp.h | 9 +++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> > > Seems fine to me. >
Did you measure the overhead from the extra call, without any special asm enhanced versions? _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
