On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 02:33:28PM -0400, Stephen Hutchinson wrote: > > From: d s <[email protected]> > > Who is that? > The author of the majority of the patch. They're the main committer to AvxSynth. >> So what's stopping us from requiring 2.6.0? AFAICT that would eliminate >> several of the issues still present in your patch. >> >> Diego > > From a user perspective Avisynth 2.6 has many more features and > options (my recommendation is that everyone should upgrade); from a > developer perspective supporting 2.6 only would improve the quality of > the patch and avoid deprecating a lot of old code when 2.5.8 reaches > EOL. > So I completely agree with Diego here. Truthfully, I only ever use 2.6 these days; it was complaints about the rewritten demuxer not working with 2.5.8 (more specifically, it's video that doesn't work with it due to the API changes between 2.5 and 2.6...audio works fine through it without any special handling) that made me get that part worked out. But I agree that trying to get 2.6 tested and out is in the best interest. I can go ahead and put in the check and drop support for 2.5.8. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
