On 16/09/13 11:22, Martin Storsjö wrote: > I think it would be better for the code clarity to add a new state for > this situation, instead of reusing the publishing state. We already have > 3 different states for playing, publishing and receiving, so this would > be 'serving' or something like that? I guess it needs to be added to a > few of the existing cases where we check for the publishing state.
I'm not so sure about it, the "state" is used to mark a specific behaviour that happens to match both publishing and serving (as in sending content). Possibly renaming it so it isn't misleading would be better. let me know. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
