On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: >> for (;;) { >> if (is->abort_request) >> break; >> @@ -2860,6 +2883,8 @@ static const OptionDef options[] = { >> { "rdftspeed", OPT_INT | HAS_ARG| OPT_AUDIO | OPT_EXPERT, { &rdftspeed >> }, "rdft speed", "msecs" }, >> { "default", HAS_ARG | OPT_AUDIO | OPT_VIDEO | OPT_EXPERT, { >> opt_default }, "generic catch all option", "" }, >> { "i", 0, { NULL }, "avconv compatibility dummy option", ""}, >> + { "ac", HAS_ARG | OPT_STRING, { &acodec_name }, "audio codec name", >> "" }, >> + { "vc", HAS_ARG | OPT_STRING, { &vcodec_name }, "video codec name", >> "" }, >> { NULL, }, > > > Would it make more sense to name them acodec and vcodec as the (old) avconv > options, instead of inventing yet another naming?
+1 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
