On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Josh Allmann wrote:
On 20 September 2013 10:17, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Luca Barbato wrote:
---
I'm not so sure we support the other kind of array btw...
Indeed, the handling of the other type of array seems wrong here. OBJECT and
MIXEDARRAY should be pretty much the same, right? While ARRAY doesn't have
string objects before each value object.
The ARRAY type is also supposed to be prefixed with the array length
as an AMF int32, something the current code doesn't handle properly.
Doesn't it skip past 4 bytes for the ARRAY case? That part of it seems ok
to me. (IIRC the array length isn't strictly necessary since they're all
still terminated with some other marker as well, and the array length is
occasionally incorrect.)
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
