On 02/10/13 15:57, Peter B. wrote: > Since you added these FFV1.0 fate tests, I was curious to ask about > libav's implementation-status of FFV1.3, now that it's bitstream was > finally frozen and released as stable. > > Does the current libav version match the official release implementation? > Unfortunately, I hadn't had time to run interoperability tests yet, so I > thought I'd ask first.
To my knowledge it didn't see any update, I'll check if there is something changed. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
