From: Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> swscale is called in from the 420 to 422 conversion --- The proposed 420 addtion is wrong since it doesn't take care of the vertically subsempled chroma, and doing it right would replicate what swscale already does. swscale is not guaranteed to be bitexact so adding the flags should fix fate. Vittorio
tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak index 20cd617..88ed9fa 100644 --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(CONFIG_FADE_FILTER) += fate-filter-fade fate-filter-fade: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf fade=in:0:25,fade=out:25:25 FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(call ALLYES, INTERLACE_FILTER FIELDORDER_FILTER) += fate-filter-fieldorder -fate-filter-fieldorder: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf interlace=tff,fieldorder=bff +fate-filter-fieldorder: CMD = framecrc -sws_flags +accurate_rnd+bitexact -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf interlace=tff,fieldorder=bff FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(CONFIG_GRADFUN_FILTER) += fate-filter-gradfun fate-filter-gradfun: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf gradfun -- 1.8.4 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
