On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:51:37PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > >> From: Andreas Unterweger <dustsi...@gmail.com> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> > > > > So while it's nice to have an example that explicitly deals with external > > libs, wouldn't it be better to start off with something that only deals > > with internal components and carries no extra dependencies first? > > While it's nice to have various examples, wouldn't it be better to > integrate what we have right now, and not reject useful work because > they don't fit in the order you prefer to have things done?
Nobody is rejecting anything. I'm just giving arguments for modifications. External dependencies create a bunch of problems when we wish to compile examples on FATE stations for example. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
