On 03/11/13 12:57, Peter B. wrote: > On 11/03/2013 12:53 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 03/11/13 12:15, Peter B. wrote: >>> I seem to be unable to find the LCOV coverage report of libav anywhere :( >>> I've tried googling, as well as a lucky-guess with "coverage.libav.org" >>> (similar to ffmpeg's URL [1]), but to no avail. >> It depends on your options enabled, so it would be meaningful only if we >> integrate it in FATE, actually might be a neat idea. > > Ok. So it's not done by default. > I just found it nice to be able to compare my FATE results to the > "official" ones, in order to spot LCOV regressions. > > >>> It might be nice to have the links to LCOV maybe in the FATE docs [2] or >>> the GcovCoverageHowTo [3] maybe? >> I'll work on it if nobody does before (again projects taking priority). > > When there's LCOV coverage report generated for libav, you could send me > the link and I can try to add it to the docs?
I'll bake it in FATE probably so as for the warnings it will tell you if your past run changed something and were. (now I have to figure out which is the best tool for this purpose) lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
