On 12/30/2013 6:20 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > "the internal time base" might make a reader think we always convert to this > timebase internally, which is not true. I'd change it to "default timebase" or > something along those lines.
I just called it that since that's what the previous doxy called it. > Also, this is not "the integer representation" of the timebase (that would be > 0), but of its inverse. Ditto. > And perhaps we could just say in the docs that it's microsecond resolution, I > don't think we're likely to change that any time soon (or ever). Doesn't matter either way to me. - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
