Hi, 2014-02-05 Martin Storsjö <[email protected]>: > Based on a patch by Ronald S. Bultje. > --- > Updated as suggested by Janne, to not require pushing anything to > the stack.
That's not really an issue worthy of additional work, but with such patches, it may be interesting to know the impact of the fix speed-wise. For instance, this second patch looks like the right thing to do. But besides that, is there an actual/objective reason, e.g. number of cycles? (I guess they can vary significantly depending on architecture, cache/memory speed etc, but still...). _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
