On 2014-02-06 12:05:16 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:28:44AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:32:59 +0100, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:59:45AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > --- a/libavcodec/ppc/vp8dsp_altivec.c > > > > +++ b/libavcodec/ppc/vp8dsp_altivec.c > > > > @@ -269,9 +269,44 @@ EPEL_HV(4, 4,6) > > > > > > > > +static void put_vp8_pixels16_altivec(uint8_t *dst, ptrdiff_t dstride, > > > > uint8_t *src, ptrdiff_t sstride, int h, int mx, int my) > > > > { > > > > } > > > > > > This duplicates the ff_put_pixels16_altivec() function from > > > libavcodec/ppc/hpeldsp_altivec.c. > > > > Yes I know. > > Got a better solution? > > What about replacing the version in hpeldsp_altivec.c with this more > flexible version?
Can we please commit this? Complaining over the duplicated ppc/altivec version is a little unfair if we already have the same duplication for C, x86 and arm. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
