On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:25:15 +0100, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 07:30:57AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:44:34 +0100, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > Based on a patch by Andrew Kelley <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > configure | 2 + > > > > doc/Makefile | 3 +- > > > > doc/examples/filter_audio.c | 362 > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > create mode 100644 doc/examples/filter_audio.c > > > > > > Keep the single-library example in libavfilter. > > > > So that the examples are randomly scattered over multiple place? No, I do > > not > > think that is a good idea. > > I just moved all examples together in the Doxygen documentation. > > > Besides, how would you define a "single-library example". This one mainly > > focuses on lavfi, but it also uses lavu directly and lavr indirectly. > > Everything uses lavu of course, so that does not count.
No, not everything necessarily uses lavu. You can perfectly well write a user program that does not call any libavutil functions directly. E.g. this one showcases some not completely trivial uses of the avoptions, avdict and avmd5 APIs. > How does theexample use lavr? Does it even compile with --disable-avresample? > If no, then you missed declaring a dependency. Yes, it compiles, but will fail at runtime if lavfi is not linked against lavr. Which is why i said it's used indirectly. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
