On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > >--- > >This is a non complete WIP, but should give a feeling on how the new API > >will be. > >Basically instead of checking .pix_fmts elements, you have to check the > >whole array of > >AVPixformatron. > > Just to lay it out clearly so there's no risk of misunderstanding > anything here. > > Make very sure you don't break more API than you need to. You should > only break the API that you REALLY HAVE TO in order to make things > better. It's a little hard to see what you intend to do with e.g. > AVFrame since that's not part of this WIP patchset, but if possible, > make sure the existing pix_fmt fields stay where they are right now > and just add new fields next to them that convey the additional > information. > > And don't pick names that Kostya just suggests as trolling.
in this case it was suggested to resemble a physical model instead of bunch of enums we have _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
